Related articles |
---|
Parsing C++ manowar@sauropod.engin.umich.edu (1996-11-15) |
Re: Parsing C++ graham.hughes@resnet.ucsb.edu (Graham Hughes) (1996-11-18) |
Re: Parsing C++ nagle@netcom.com (1996-11-18) |
Re: Parsing C++ jsgray@acm.org (Jan Gray) (1996-11-19) |
Re: Parsing C++ jlilley@empathy.com (1996-12-03) |
Re: Parsing C++ dlmoore@ix.netcom.com (David L Moore) (1996-12-07) |
Re: Parsing C++ jlilley@empathy.com (1996-12-09) |
[3 later articles] |
From: | manowar@sauropod.engin.umich.edu (Krisztian Flautner) |
Newsgroups: | comp.lang.c++.moderated,comp.compilers |
Date: | 15 Nov 1996 11:36:12 -0500 |
Organization: | ACAL / University of Michigan |
Keywords: | C++, parse, question |
I have been reading "The Design and Evolution of C++" book, in which
Stroustrup mentions that there is considerable difficulty parsing
C++ with a LALR(1) grammar.
Could someone give me some examples of language features that cause
problems ? Has anyone made an analysis of what kind of grammar could
be used to parse C++ without problems ?
Thanks, -- Kris
[ Send an empty e-mail to c++-help@netlab.cs.rpi.edu for info ]
[ about comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: do this! ]
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.