Re: Q: Documentation tools for compiler/languages ?

Dave Love <d.love@daresbury.ac.uk>
5 Nov 1996 23:32:14 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Q: Documentation tools for compiler/languages ? pizka@informatik.tu-muenchen.de (1996-10-20)
Re: Q: Documentation tools for compiler/languages ? florian@watson.ibm.com (Florian Krohm) (1996-10-24)
Re: Q: Documentation tools for compiler/languages ? ddw@miscrit.be (Dominique de Waleffe) (1996-10-24)
Re: Q: Documentation tools for compiler/languages ? stephen@lila.york.ac.uk (1996-10-25)
Re: Q: Documentation tools for compiler/languages ? Venkateswara.Rao@cho.ge.com (Venkateswara Rao) (1996-10-25)
Re: Q: Documentation tools for compiler/languages ? d.love@daresbury.ac.uk (Dave Love) (1996-11-05)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Dave Love <d.love@daresbury.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 5 Nov 1996 23:32:14 -0500
Organization: Daresbury Laboratory, Warrington WA4 4AD, UK
References: 96-10-092 96-10-132
Keywords: tools

  stephen parker <stephen@lila.york.ac.uk> writes:


> Noweb can be convinced to produce plain TeX, LaTex or html
> output. the actual source is not pretty printed


It's not usually prettyprinted, but it can be if required by using an
extra filter in the pipeline -- there's an example in the noweb
contrib directory somewhere.
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.