Related articles |
---|
[4 earlier articles] |
Re: Are Associative Arrays unique to Perl? ok@cs.rmit.edu.au (1996-10-24) |
Re: Are Associative Arrays unique to Perl? hbaker@netcom.com (1996-10-25) |
Re: Are Associative Arrays unique to Perl? phr@netcom.com (1996-10-30) |
Re: Are Associative Arrays unique to Perl? ian@five-d.com (1996-10-30) |
Re: Are Associative Arrays unique to Perl? lhf@csg.uwaterloo.ca (1996-10-30) |
Re: Are Associative Arrays unique to Perl? boffi@rachele.stru.polimi.it (giacomo boffi) (1996-10-30) |
Re: Are Associative Arrays unique to Perl? sitaram@diac.com (1996-11-03) |
Re: Are Associative Arrays unique to Perl? hbaker@netcom.com (1996-11-03) |
Re: Are Associative Arrays unique to Perl? hammen@gothamcity.jsc.nasa.gov (Dave Hammen) (1996-11-05) |
From: | sitaram@diac.com (Sitaram Chamarty) |
Newsgroups: | comp.lang.perl.misc,comp.lang.misc,comp.compilers |
Date: | 3 Nov 1996 00:30:28 -0500 |
Organization: | none |
References: | <5437ev$30u@shell1.aimnet.com> <545mqn$qul@picasso.op.net> 96-10-099 96-10-141 |
Keywords: | design |
(I'm responding to the subject line, so no quotes...)
I saw this question some time ago, and was so sure someone would post
this that I didnt bother. Since noone seems to have (that I can see),
let me add Rexx to the list. Rexx calls them "stemmed variables", but
they are really just associative arrays - the syntax places a "."
between the root of the stem and the variable that contains the key,
so that:
$hash{$key}
would be
hash.key
in Rexx. (In Rexx, any variable that hasnt been assigned to, springs
into existence with a string value that is the variable name's
uppercased version, so this works rather like Perl's barewords
interpretation). More details in private e-mail if the original
poster wants <sheepish grin> forgot who it was :-(
Sitaram.
[You can get much the same effect using Lisp property lists, and that
goes back to at least 1960. Any earlier refs? I think Lisp is
earlier than COMIT. -John]
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.