Related articles |
---|
[4 earlier articles] |
Re: Choosing a language for compiler design ukcwitd@cambridge.simoco.com (Tim Wilson 6093) (1996-10-18) |
Re: Choosing a language for compiler design icedancer@ibm.net (1996-10-18) |
Re: Choosing a language for compiler design bmd@cs.kuleuven.ac.be (Bart Demoen) (1996-10-20) |
Re: Choosing a language for compiler design jsa@alexandria.organon.com (1996-10-20) |
Re: Choosing a language for compiler design jsa@alexandria.organon.com (1996-10-20) |
Re: Choosing a language for compiler design joshua@intrinsa.com (Joshua Levy) (1996-10-20) |
Re: Choosing a language for compiler design pbrisset@apoge.eis.enac.dgac.fr (Pascal Brisset) (1996-10-24) |
Re: Choosing a language for compiler design will@ccs.neu.edu (William D Clinger) (1996-10-24) |
Re: Choosing a language for compiler design rgh@shellus.com (1996-11-01) |
Re: Choosing a language for compiler design geraldo@nw.com.br (1996-11-05) |
From: | Pascal Brisset <pbrisset@apoge.eis.enac.dgac.fr> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 24 Oct 1996 22:21:17 -0400 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 96-10-022 96-10-090 |
Keywords: | design |
Bart Demoen <bmd@cs.kuleuven.ac.be> writes:
> To the suggestions of other people (Lisp, ML, Perl ...), I would like
> to add: do it in a logic programming language. If you want
> portability, type checking and speed, take Mercury.
Another candidate from the logic programming class: lambda-Prolog.
If you want an easy representation for the expressions you compile.
Look at http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~dale/lProlog
--Pascal
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.