Related articles |
---|
Analysis and optimization frameworks related work? jdean@stash.pa.dec.com (1996-10-12) |
Re: Analysis and optimization frameworks related work? creusil@cri.ensmp.fr (1996-10-15) |
Re: Analysis and optimization frameworks related work? cliffc@risc.sps.mot.com (1996-10-15) |
Re: Analysis and optimization frameworks related work? jyates@gis.net (1996-10-16) |
Re: Analysis and optimization frameworks related work? assmann@ipd.info.uni-karlsruhe.de (1996-10-18) |
Re: Analysis and optimization frameworks related work? uday@cs.unipune.ernet.in (Uday P Khedker) (1996-10-20) |
From: | cliffc@risc.sps.mot.com (Cliff Click) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 15 Oct 1996 09:39:31 -0400 |
Organization: | none |
References: | 96-10-044 |
Keywords: | tools |
jdean@stash.pa.dec.com (Jeff Dean) writes:
This is a request for information about related work on frameworks
that make it easier to design and implement compiler optimizations.
I'd also appreciate any philosophical comments or anecdotes that
people might have about such frameworks..
Try my IR'95 paper or any of the VDG papers for a different kind of
framework. I do things completely sparse, no bitvectors please.
o Multiple analyses & transformations can easily be combined
together to run in parallel when there are synergistic effects from
doing so (Click & Cooper have developed a theoretical framework that
specifies when combining multiple optimizations together is desirable;
our framework makes combining such optimizations easy to do in
practice).
Wow! I always wondered if this sank into the deep, or if
somebody read it.
Cliff
--
Cliff Click, Ph.D. Compiler Researcher & Designer
RISC Software, Motorola PowerPC Compilers
cliffc@risc.sps.mot.com (512) 891-7240
http://members.aol.com/mjclick1
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.