From: | Stefan Monnier <stefan.monnier@lia.di.epfl.ch> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 27 Aug 1996 23:49:06 -0400 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 96-08-058 96-08-070 96-08-085 |
Keywords: | parse |
itz@rahul.net (Ian T Zimmerman) writes:
> One problem (admittedly of a different nature) is that allowing this makes
> implementation much harder. Therefore, there'll be fewer and more expensive
> implementations, and the organisations responsible for the few
So true (ahem).
Example: Scheme is so much more widely available than C++ due to C++ simple
minded grammar.
If you have tried to write a (complete) C++ parser, you know that it can totally
prevent someone from even considering writing a C++ compiler. And yet there are
tons of dozens of C++ compilers.
Stefan
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.