Related articles |
---|
How to write this RE? sc7099011@ntuvax.ntu.ac.sg (Johnny Wong) (1996-08-11) |
Re: How to write this RE? fjh@mundook.cs.mu.OZ.AU (1996-08-13) |
Re: How to write this RE? eadengle@dino.uwaterloo.ca (1996-08-13) |
Re: How to write this RE? rwatson@CAM.ORG (Richard Edward Watson) (1996-08-15) |
Re: How to write this RE? bart@time.cirl.uoregon.edu (1996-08-16) |
Re: How to write this RE? torbenm@diku.dk (1996-08-16) |
Re: How to write this RE? bromage@cs.mu.OZ.AU (1996-08-19) |
From: | bromage@cs.mu.OZ.AU (Andrew Bromage) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 19 Aug 1996 23:10:39 -0400 |
Organization: | Comp Sci, University of Melbourne |
References: | 96-08-034 |
Keywords: | lex |
G'day all.
Johnny Wong <sc7099011@ntuvax.ntu.ac.sg> writes:
> Give the regular definitions for the following language:
> All strings of digits with no repeated digits.
If you're allowed to use the interleave product operator, there is a
rather compact representation for it:
0? x 1? x 2? x 3? x 4? x 5? x 6? x 7? x 8? x 9?
Where E? = (\lambda | E) and 'x' is interleave product.
Cheers,
Andrew Bromage
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.