Related articles |
---|
How to write this RE? sc7099011@ntuvax.ntu.ac.sg (Johnny Wong) (1996-08-11) |
Re: How to write this RE? fjh@mundook.cs.mu.OZ.AU (1996-08-13) |
Re: How to write this RE? eadengle@dino.uwaterloo.ca (1996-08-13) |
Re: How to write this RE? rwatson@CAM.ORG (Richard Edward Watson) (1996-08-15) |
Re: How to write this RE? bart@time.cirl.uoregon.edu (1996-08-16) |
Re: How to write this RE? torbenm@diku.dk (1996-08-16) |
Re: How to write this RE? bromage@cs.mu.OZ.AU (1996-08-19) |
From: | Richard Edward Watson <rwatson@CAM.ORG> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 15 Aug 1996 17:42:39 -0400 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 96-08-034 |
Keywords: | lex, DFA |
Hi there,
Since the size of an alphabet is finite (say n) then the number of
passible words without repeating a symbol is also finite (assuming leading
zeros don't count). Since any finite language is regular, you have your
proof. The recursive solution is (at first prettier), but you cannot
construct an automaton from it neatly.
Richard
--
Richard E. Watson (Compiler Architect) | E-mail: rwatson@RibbitSoft.com
Ribbit Software Systems Inc. | Tel: + 1 (604) 762-6591
| FAX: + 1 (604) 762-6511
| WEB: www.RibbitSoft.com
| Address: Box 24040, 297 Bernard
| Kelowna, B.C.
| V1Y 9P9, Canada
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.