Re: failure due to compiler?

Ian Moor <iwm@doc.ic.ac.uk>
20 Jul 1996 21:32:18 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[17 earlier articles]
Re: failure due to compiler? glew@ichips.intel.com (1996-07-16)
Re: failure due to compiler? WStreett@shell.monmouth.com (1996-07-16)
Re: failure due to compiler? grout@polestar.csrd.uiuc.edu (1996-07-18)
Re: failure due to compiler? gah@u.washington.edu (1996-07-19)
Re: failure due to compiler? ok@cs.rmit.edu.au (1996-07-20)
Re: failure due to compiler? LEEW@FS.MICROLOGIC.COM (Lee Webber) (1996-07-20)
Re: failure due to compiler? iwm@doc.ic.ac.uk (Ian Moor) (1996-07-20)
Re: failure due to compiler? WStreett@shell.monmouth.com (1996-07-20)
Re: failure due to compiler? jgllgher@maths.tcd.ie (Dara Gallagher) (1996-07-20)
Re: failure due to compiler? ok@cs.rmit.edu.au (1996-07-22)
Re: failure due to compiler? rfg@monkeys.com (1996-07-22)
Re: failure due to compiler? leew@micrologic.com (Lee Webber) (1996-07-23)
Re: failure due to compiler? eric@gyst.com (Eric Hamilton) (1996-07-23)
[5 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Ian Moor <iwm@doc.ic.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 20 Jul 1996 21:32:18 -0400
Organization: Dept. of Computing, Imperial College, University of London, UK.
References: 96-07-035 96-07-052 96-07-089
Keywords: errors, modula

Code generated by a Modula2 compiler for passing a 3 character record
(by value) to a procedure left the stack pointer in the wrong place.
The main problem was explaining to a class of beginners progammers
why their programs failed.
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.