Re: Commercial compiler constructed via generator?

canalda@palinka.inria.fr (Philippe Canalda)
13 Jul 1996 22:01:24 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Commercial compiler constructed via generator? jjyang@csie.nctu.edu.tw (1996-06-27)
Re: Commercial compiler constructed via generator? rob@ace.nl (Rob Kurver) (1996-06-30)
Re: Commercial compiler constructed via generator? p.froehlich@amc.cube.net (1996-07-10)
Re: Commercial compiler constructed via generator? CSPT@giraffe.ru.ac.za (Pat Terry) (1996-07-13)
Re: Commercial compiler constructed via generator? canalda@palinka.inria.fr (1996-07-13)
Re: Commercial compiler constructed via generator? farzu@kirika.uvg.edu.gt (Francisco Arzu) (1996-07-13)
Re: Commercial compiler constructed via generator? edcjones@access2.digex.net (1996-07-15)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: canalda@palinka.inria.fr (Philippe Canalda)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 13 Jul 1996 22:01:24 -0400
Organization: INRIA Rocquencourt, France
References: 96-06-135
Keywords: tools, performance

jjyang@csie.nctu.edu.tw (Ji-Tzay Yang) writes:
|> The problem is: Are there examples showing that a well-designed
|> compiler generator doing better than hand-coded program in
|> average during some compiler construction stages?


As Peter Froehlich said:
<< I'm not sure if I understand your question 100% but ... >>


... but I'm 99% sure you will find some pieces of answer in Anthony
M. Sloane article.


A.M. Sloane
``An evaluation of an automatically generated compiler.''
ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems,
Vol.17, \numero 5, September 1995, pp 691-703.


I hope this helps.
--
    Philippe Canalda, Computer Science Ph.D student at INRIA Rocquencourt
    "Contribution to Automatic Generation of Operational and Optimizing
      Instructions Selectors based on A Realistic and Efficient Costed Bottom-Up
      Rewriting System" Email: Philippe.Canalda@inria.fr
--


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.