Related articles |
---|
[6 earlier articles] |
Re: failure due to compiler? dennis@netcom.com (1996-07-10) |
Re: failure due to compiler? grout@polestar.csrd.uiuc.edu (1996-07-10) |
Re: failure due to compiler? khays@sequent.com (1996-07-10) |
Re: failure due to compiler? cliffc@ami.sps.mot.com (1996-07-10) |
Re: failure due to compiler? WStreett@shell.monmouth.com (1996-07-13) |
Re: failure due to compiler? jfc@mit.edu (1996-07-13) |
Re: failure due to compiler? bobduff@world.std.com (1996-07-13) |
Re: failure due to compiler? baynes@ukpsshp1.serigate.philips.nl (1996-07-13) |
Re: failure due to compiler? alain@phidani.be (Corchia Alain) (1996-07-15) |
Re: failure due to compiler? dave_sc@csl.sri.com (1996-07-15) |
Re: failure due to compiler? kanze@lts.sel.alcatel.de (1996-07-16) |
Re: failure due to compiler? glew@ichips.intel.com (1996-07-16) |
Re: failure due to compiler? WStreett@shell.monmouth.com (1996-07-16) |
[17 later articles] |
From: | bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 13 Jul 1996 21:33:09 -0400 |
Organization: | The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA |
References: | 96-07-041 96-07-056 96-07-064 |
Keywords: | errors |
Dennis Yelle <dennis@netcom.com> wrote:
that somebody wrote:
>|> I am looking for pointers or references to descriptions where software
>|> has compiled without error and later failed due to compiler-introduced
>|> errors in the resultant program. In other words, the source was deemed
>|> to be error free but the compiler botched the code generation.
Yes, compilers have bugs. I've seen many. What would be more
interesting (to me, anyway) would be cases where compiler bugs actually
caused some real damage. E.g. so-and-so plane crashed because of a
compiler bug, and killed so-and-so number of people. Or so-and-so
company lost $100,000 because of a compiler bug. Or some such thing.
- Bob
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.