Related articles |
---|
GNU gcc/g++ with 386 segmented architecture. mgcd@QSof01.alcbel.be (1996-06-24) |
Re: GNU gcc/g++ with 386 segmented architecture. kanze@lts.sel.alcatel.de (1996-06-24) |
Re: GNU gcc/g++ with 386 segmented architecture. dennis@netcom.com (1996-06-26) |
Re: GNU gcc/g++ with 386 segmented architecture. khays@sequent.com (1996-06-26) |
Re: GNU gcc/g++ with 386 segmented architecture. bill.williams@gecm.com (1996-06-27) |
Re: GNU gcc/g++ with 386 segmented architecture. dlmoore@ix.netcom.com (1996-06-30) |
Re: GNU gcc/g++ with 386 segmented architecture. paik@3dfx.com (1996-07-01) |
Re: GNU gcc/g++ with 386 segmented architecture. dlmoore@ix.netcom.com (1996-07-01) |
Re: GNU gcc/g++ with 386 segmented architecture. brian@watcom.on.ca (1996-07-01) |
Re: GNU gcc/g++ with 386 segmented architecture. sef@kithrup.com (Sean Eric Fagan) (1996-07-01) |
From: | paik@3dfx.com |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 1 Jul 1996 10:16:27 -0400 |
Organization: | 3Dfx Interactive |
References: | 96-06-100 |
Keywords: | 386, performance, C |
[John: C compiler that did 386 large model]
[Dave: Watcom V10.5 claims it does them]
I've used far pointers in Watcom 10.5. They work, but while I
haven't gone and disassembled the generated code, they seem to
be very slow. Some code we have here which interfaces to some
hardware runs at about 1/2 performance when the hardware is
mapped through far pointers instead of near.
Sam Paik
--
Samuel S. Paik / paik@3dfx.com / 415-919-2441 / I speak only for myself
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.