Related articles |
---|
Writing an interpreter Arne.Evertsson@Octalogic.se (1996-06-01) |
Re: Writing an interpreter oplec@westminster.ac.uk (Psi) (1996-06-08) |
Re: Writing an interpreter emcee@efi.com (1996-06-08) |
Re: Writing an interpreter adf@idt.unit.no (1996-06-13) |
Re: Writing an interpreter qjackson@direct.ca (1996-06-13) |
From: | Arne.Evertsson@Octalogic.se (Arne Evertsson) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 1 Jun 1996 23:25:40 -0400 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
Keywords: | interpreter, question, comment |
I am writing an interpreter for a pascal-like programming language. I have
no previous experience of compiler/interpreter construction, so I am wondering
Which is easier:
* Write a compiler that produces p-code, and find an existing p-code
interpreter.
* Write my own interpreter
If I write my own interpreter I will write a program that executes a parse tree.
I write a compiler that produces p-code, I will have to learn p-code, and
then find an existing p-code interpreter (that runs under ms-dos/windows 3.1).
/Arne
*****************
Arne@Octalogic.se
*****************
[Well, there's always the P-code interpreter in Microsoft C. -John]
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.