Re: Why do intermediate codes have >, >=?

mark@omnifest.uwm.edu (Mark Hopkins)
25 May 1996 23:58:02 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Why do intermediate codes have >, >=? alan@ez2.ezlink.com (1996-05-21)
Re: Why do intermediate codes have >, >=? mark@omnifest.uwm.edu (1996-05-25)
Re: Why do intermediate codes have >, >=? henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer) (1996-06-13)
Re: Why do intermediate codes have >, >=? cwf@research.bell-labs.com (Chris Fraser) (1996-06-21)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: mark@omnifest.uwm.edu (Mark Hopkins)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 25 May 1996 23:58:02 -0400
Organization: Omnifest
References: 96-05-144
Keywords: optimize

      You may want the translation to proceed in such a fashion that everything
remains in the same order (i.e. that you're working with a Simple Syntax
Directed Translation (SSDT) instead of an SDT). Then you should retain
all the relational operators. This saves the need for an extra stack.


--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.