Visual Parse++ ?

dirkv@netcom.com (Dirk Vermeersch)
21 May 1996 16:18:43 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Visual Parse++ ? nospam@btinternet.com (Big Softie) (2003-03-22)
Visual Parse++ ? dirkv@netcom.com (1996-05-21)
Re: Visual Parse++ ? jlilley@ix.netcom.com (1996-05-24)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: dirkv@netcom.com (Dirk Vermeersch)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 21 May 1996 16:18:43 -0400
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
Keywords: tools, question

Does anybody know how good the drop in C++ grammar for Visual Parse++ is
( does it support templates, rtti ?)


What is the performance of this parser ? Which other commercial parsers
have a good C++ grammar available. Currently I'm using the PCCTS C++
grammar, but I'm having some performance problems ( due to my own additions
to the original grammar, to make it work with OWL/MFC/STL). So ideally I
would like to find a parser which has support for the latest C++ language
specification. ( Delphi would be a plus as well.)


Thanks,
Dirk Vermeersch


--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.