Related articles |
---|
parsing a finite element language doolin@menkar.cs.utk.edu (1996-05-01) |
Re: parsing a finite element language landers@Centric.COM (1996-05-03) |
From: | doolin@menkar.cs.utk.edu (David Doolin) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 1 May 1996 23:17:42 -0400 |
Organization: | Computer Science Dept, University of Tennessee, Knoxville |
Keywords: | parse, question |
I need to rewrite my entire input routine for a simple finite element
code. I would like to do it correctly this time. Since there are
certain elements common to all FE input, I am thinking maybe that I
should put some thought into formalizing a little `language' before
writing a parser. Such concepts are not covered in geology (BS) or
civil eng. (MS) curriculums.
Is this a good idea? Or would it be better to insist on rigidly
formatted input?
TIA,
Dave Doolin
doolin@cs.utk.edu
[Yes, it's almost certainly a good idea. Rigidly formatted input made sense
in keypunch days, but now it's mostly an invitation to screw up. -John]
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.