|Please Help Me - 80386 Vs MIL-STD-1750A email@example.com (John McCabe) (1996-04-02)|
|Re: Please Help Me - 80386 Vs MIL-STD-1750A firstname.lastname@example.org (1996-04-04)|
|From:||email@example.com (Jan Vorbrueggen)|
|Date:||4 Apr 1996 00:18:18 -0500|
|Organization:||Institut fuer Neuroinformatik, Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum, Germany|
John McCabe <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
I have been asked to jot down a list of advantages and disadvantages of
using an Intel 386 against a GPS MA31750 (MIL-STD-1750A) processor by the
end of this week (5th April 1996).
The software will be a real-time design in an embedded system, probably
developed and cross-compiled using a UNIX box.
So why do you want to use a 386? The job you're describing seems to be
ideally suited to using a transputer, probably a T425. As far as I
know, space- qualified parts are available and have been flown (Mars
Observer?). Software development is easy and well suited to the task
(real-time, embedded), with very efficient code. Or do you _really_
want to develop such a system in Ada??
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.