Re: specifications (was Re: Languages: The Bigger the Uglier)

ok@cs.rmit.edu.au (Richard A. O'Keefe)
27 Mar 1996 00:03:17 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[9 earlier articles]
Re: specifications (was Re: Languages: The Bigger the Uglier) pardo@cs.washington.edu (1996-03-22)
Re: specifications (was Re: Languages: The Bigger the Uglier) jgj@ssd.hcsc.com (1996-03-22)
Re: specifications (was Re: Languages: The Bigger the Uglier) hbaker@netcom.com (1996-03-23)
Re: specifications (was Re: Languages: The Bigger the Uglier) bobduff@world.std.com (1996-03-24)
Re: specifications (was Re: Languages: The Bigger the Uglier) bobduff@world.std.com (1996-03-24)
Re: specifications (was Re: Languages: The Bigger the Uglier) jgj@ssd.hcsc.com (1996-03-25)
Re: specifications (was Re: Languages: The Bigger the Uglier) ok@cs.rmit.edu.au (1996-03-27)
Re: specifications (was Re: Languages: The Bigger the Uglier) fjh@cs.mu.OZ.AU (1996-03-27)
Re: specifications (was Re: Languages: The Bigger the Uglier) bobduff@world.std.com (1996-03-27)
Re: specifications (was Re: Languages: The Bigger the Uglier) tkb@sol.newnet.navy.mil (T. Kurt Bond) (1996-03-27)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: ok@cs.rmit.edu.au (Richard A. O'Keefe)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 27 Mar 1996 00:03:17 -0500
Organization: Comp Sci, RMIT, Melbourne, Australia
References: 96-02-226 96-03-151 96-03-164
Keywords: standards

Reference implementations:


        How many people reading this newsgroup knew that there _is_ a
        "Model Implementation of Standard Pascal"?


        How many people have ever _used_ it?


        I wonder how many people have ever used a Pascal compiler whose
        authors used the Model Implementation as a reference.
--
Richard A. O'Keefe; http://www.cs.rmit.edu.au/~ok; RMIT Comp.Sci.
[Don't leave us in suspense -- where is it? -John]


--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.