Re: specifications (was Re: Languages: The Bigger the Uglier)

hbaker@netcom.com (Henry Baker)
23 Mar 1996 15:13:04 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[5 earlier articles]
Re: specifications (was Re: Languages: The Bigger the Uglier) jejones@microware.com (1996-03-16)
Re: specifications (was Re: Languages: The Bigger the Uglier) hbaker@netcom.com (1996-03-17)
Re: specifications (was Re: Languages: The Bigger the Uglier) jgj@ssd.hcsc.com (1996-03-20)
Re: specifications (was Re: Languages: The Bigger the Uglier) bobduff@world.std.com (1996-03-22)
Re: specifications (was Re: Languages: The Bigger the Uglier) pardo@cs.washington.edu (1996-03-22)
Re: specifications (was Re: Languages: The Bigger the Uglier) jgj@ssd.hcsc.com (1996-03-22)
Re: specifications (was Re: Languages: The Bigger the Uglier) hbaker@netcom.com (1996-03-23)
Re: specifications (was Re: Languages: The Bigger the Uglier) bobduff@world.std.com (1996-03-24)
Re: specifications (was Re: Languages: The Bigger the Uglier) bobduff@world.std.com (1996-03-24)
Re: specifications (was Re: Languages: The Bigger the Uglier) jgj@ssd.hcsc.com (1996-03-25)
Re: specifications (was Re: Languages: The Bigger the Uglier) ok@cs.rmit.edu.au (1996-03-27)
Re: specifications (was Re: Languages: The Bigger the Uglier) fjh@cs.mu.OZ.AU (1996-03-27)
Re: specifications (was Re: Languages: The Bigger the Uglier) bobduff@world.std.com (1996-03-27)
[1 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: hbaker@netcom.com (Henry Baker)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 23 Mar 1996 15:13:04 -0500
Organization: nil organization
References: 96-02-226 96-03-123 96-03-151 96-03-164
Keywords: standards

> [I'd be pretty pessimistic about the possibility of getting such a reference
> implementation even as well debugged as your typical standards document. -John]


Uh... Don't 'de facto' standards already use an 'implementation' for
the standard? I.e., 'your fortran has to be compatible with
DEC/Cray/IBM...'. No one in their right mind uses the published
documentation of these de facto standards for more than scratch paper --
they go straight for the actual implementation, since that's what the
customers care about.


The DEC/Cray/IBM's of the world then find that even _they_ can't change
the behavior of their compiler by 'fixing bugs' without risking the rage
of their customers. :-)
--
www/ftp directory:
ftp://ftp.netcom.com/pub/hb/hbaker/home.html
--


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.