Related articles |
---|
Possible to write compiler to Java VM? (I volunteer to summarize) seibel@sirius.com (Peter Seibel) (1996-01-17) |
Re: Languages: The Bigger the Uglier CSPT@giraffe.ru.ac.za (Pat Terry) (1996-02-20) |
Modula II darius@phidani.be (Darius Blasband) (1996-02-23) |
Re: Languages: The Bigger the Uglier neitzel@gaertner.de (1996-02-23) |
Re: Modula II CSPT@giraffe.ru.ac.za (Pat Terry) (1996-02-26) |
From: | "Pat Terry" <CSPT@giraffe.ru.ac.za> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 26 Feb 1996 10:39:01 -0500 |
Organization: | Rhodes University |
References: | 96-01-037 96-02-237 96-02-288 |
Keywords: | modula, standards, design |
> [I don't suppose that anyone in the Modula-2 committee took the failure of
> the VDM effort as an indication that the language was too big? -John]
My point is not that Modula-2 _was_ too big. The standardisation effort gave
us a language that _is_ much bigger. The original Modula-2 was pretty
compact.
Pat Terry, Computer Science, Rhodes University, GRAHAMSTOWN 6140, RSA
cspt@cs.ru.ac.za or cspt@giraffe.ru.ac.za or pdterry@psg.com
Voice +27-461-318291 or +27-461-318292 FAX +27-461-25049
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.