Related articles |
---|
Van Wijngaarden grammars tjj@thumper.bellcore.com (1991-07-22) |
Re: van Wijngaarden grammars eggert@twinsun.com (1991-07-25) |
Re: Van Wijngaarden grammars dww@math.fu-berlin.de (1991-07-25) |
Re: Van Wijngaarden grammars tjj@thumper.bellcore.com (1991-07-29) |
Re: Van Wijngaarden grammars hugh@cs.kun.nl (1991-08-02) |
Van Wijngaarden grammars bevan@computer-science.manchester.ac.uk (Stephen J Bevan) (1991-08-02) |
Re: Van Wijngaarden grammars chl@cs.man.ac.uk (Charles Lindsey) (1991-08-07) |
Van Wijngaarden grammars fanf2@thor.cam.ac.uk (1996-02-24) |
Re: Van Wijngaarden grammars solution@gate.net (1996-02-26) |
Re: Van Wijngaarden grammars mparks@oz.net (Michael Parkes) (1996-02-27) |
Re: Van Wijngaarden grammars dave@occl-cam.demon.co.uk (Dave Lloyd) (1996-02-27) |
Van Wijngaarden grammars dave@occl-cam.demon.co.uk (Dave Lloyd) (1996-02-27) |
Re: Van Wijngaarden grammars gvcormac@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca (Gordon V. Cormack) (1996-03-01) |
From: | fanf2@thor.cam.ac.uk (Tony Finch) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 24 Feb 1996 23:33:19 -0500 |
Organization: | Hinc Lucem et Pocula Sacra |
Keywords: | parse, question, algol68 |
I have a couple of questions:
Have any languages other than Algol68 used van Wijngaarden grammars
for their definition?
Has anyone written a compiler generator that uses van Wijngaarden
grammars to describe the language to be compiled?
Tony (currently trying to understand the Revised Report).
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.