Related articles |
---|
Algol68 compiler ? news@chaos.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (1996-02-19) |
Re: Algol68 compiler ? Arthur.Chance@Smallworld.co.uk (1996-02-21) |
Re: Algol68 compiler ? ag129@ucs.cam.ac.uk (1996-02-21) |
Re: Algol68 compiler ? Roger@natron.demon.co.uk (Roger Barnett) (1996-02-21) |
Algol68 compiler ? dave@occl-cam.demon.co.uk (Dave Lloyd) (1996-02-21) |
Algol68 compiler ? derek@knosof.co.uk (Derek M Jones) (1996-02-22) |
Re: Algol68 compiler ? dave@occl-cam.demon.co.uk (Dave Lloyd) (1996-02-23) |
Re: Algol68 compiler ? pat@ktgroup.co.uk (1996-02-23) |
Re: Algol68 compiler ? aap@praxis.co.uk (1996-02-23) |
[2 later articles] |
From: | ag129@ucs.cam.ac.uk (A. Grant) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 21 Feb 1996 21:54:13 -0500 |
Organization: | University of Cambridge |
References: | 96-02-236 96-02-240 |
Keywords: | algol68 |
Arthur.Chance@Smallworld.co.uk (Arthur Chance) writes:
>Does anyone know what happened to the Algol 68RS system? AFAIR, this
>specifically to be portable. It was sold commercially by a software
>house whose name escapes my ageing memory
Harlequin?
Try looking at
http://www.europe.ibm.com/getdoc/psmemea/progserv/dap/news/algol68.html
The Algol 68 compiler featured there is not free but it's not
expensive compared to a professional C compiler. I've met
the guy who wrote it and he's a real Algol 68 enthusiast.
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.