Re: marking mystery code

rfg@monkeys.com (Ronald F. Guilmette)
19 Feb 1996 16:03:54 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[3 earlier articles]
Re: marking mystery code jmccarty@spdmail.spd.dsccc.com (1996-02-14)
Re: marking mystery code jgj@ssd.hcsc.com (1996-02-16)
Re: marking mystery code hagerman@ece.cmu.edu (1996-02-16)
Re: marking mystery code mnp@compass-da.com (Mitchell Perilstein) (1996-02-16)
Re: marking mystery code toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl (Toon Moene) (1996-02-16)
Re: marking mystery code preston@tera.com (1996-02-17)
Re: marking mystery code rfg@monkeys.com (1996-02-19)
Re: marking mystery code kanze@lts.sel.alcatel.de (James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #40763) (1996-02-21)
Re: marking mystery code xanthian@qualcomm.com (1996-02-24)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: rfg@monkeys.com (Ronald F. Guilmette)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 19 Feb 1996 16:03:54 -0500
Organization: Infinite Monkeys & Co.
References: 96-01-116 96-02-138 96-02-168
Keywords: C, GCC

)Gary says
)[FSF code has mystery code, just like dusty Fortran decks in 1976]


Robert Dewar <dewar@cs.nyu.edu> wrote:
)Gary, are you speaking from personal experiences with the FSF sources,
)which many people have found easy to work with, or are you borrowing
)second or third hand comments without this personal experience?


Mike McCarty <jmccarty@spdmail.spd.dsccc.com> wrote:
>I can speak from personal experience working with the FSF code. It is
>generally bloated, difficult (read: impossible) to read, uncommented,
>and much of it is totally unmaintainable.


I have over 7 years of experience with all manner of GNU code... but
mostly the compilers.


I'm afraid that I have to agree with Mr. McCarty.
--


-- Ron Guilmette, Roseville, CA -------- Infinite Monkeys & Co. ------------
---- E-mail: rfg@monkeys.com ----------- Purveyors of Compiler Test Suites -
--


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.