Re: Compilers for ultra-compact byte code?

maatwerk@euronet.nl (M.M. van der Laan)
16 Feb 1996 23:50:24 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Compilers for ultra-compact byte code? phr@netcom.com (1996-02-09)
Re: Compilers for ultra-compact byte code? koopman@cs.cmu.edu (1996-02-13)
Re: Compilers for ultra-compact byte code? cliffc@ami.sps.mot.com (1996-02-13)
Re: Compilers for ultra-compact byte code? taj@vanbc.wimsey.com (1996-02-16)
Re: Compilers for ultra-compact byte code? maatwerk@euronet.nl (1996-02-16)
Re: Compilers for ultra-compact byte code? hbaker@netcom.com (1996-02-17)
Re: Compilers for ultra-compact byte code? cdg@nullstone.com (1996-02-17)
Re: Compilers for ultra-compact byte code? todd@cs.arizona.edu (1996-02-18)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: maatwerk@euronet.nl (M.M. van der Laan)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 16 Feb 1996 23:50:24 -0500
Organization: Euronet Internet
References: 96-02-096
Keywords: interpreter

phr@netcom.com (Paul Rubin) writes:
>I'm wondering what languages and compilers are available for
>implementing programs with the idea of using an absolute minimum
>amount of output code space. The idea is to compile to some byte-code
>format which would then be interpreted at runtime. My intended target
>machines are 8-bit microcontrollers with very limited program and data
>memory.


We are working on a compiler that produces very compact bytecode.
Some tests have indicated a compression ratio of 90% on C++-like code.


Our runtime doesn't interpret the code, but generates machine language
before it executes. This 'post-compilation' method is faster than
interpretation, especially for loops. And because postcompiling is
only done for modules currently executing, a program uses less memory.


You might use a similar method for microcontrollers. In fact, we
thought about it ourselves. However, the problem is the size of the
interpreter. So in our view there is not much to gain.


Regards, Mauk van der Laan
--


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.