Related articles |
---|
Link time optimizations jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr (1996-02-09) |
Re: Link time optimizations jaidi@ubd.edu.bn (1996-02-10) |
Re: Link time optimizations richard@atheist.tamu.edu (1996-02-13) |
Re: Link time optimizations jaidi@ubd.edu.bn (1996-02-14) |
From: | jaidi@ubd.edu.bn (Nor Jaidi) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 14 Feb 1996 21:22:42 -0500 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 96-02-088 96-02-104 |
Keywords: | linker, optimize |
Earlier I posted the following:
>Procedure calls are segment-relative and this is also invisible.
>Anyway, you also have to consider the possibility of indirect call (via
>pointer to function). (Another "damn it!" I guess)
I realise now that I am wrong. Procedure calls are not invisible in
the obj file because there is a possibility that two obj files use the
same segment name and these must be merged, hence relocation must
occur. When I posted my previous message I was thinking of compiler
output where the segment names are distinct (derived from the source
file names). But I forgot that the assembly language programmers are
still out there and the obj file format must cater for their taste!
Nor Jaidi jaidi@ubd.edu.bn
Department of Mathematics
Universiti Brunei Darussalam
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.