Re: Ada GC

rfg@monkeys.com (Ronald F. Guilmette)
13 Feb 1996 18:04:32 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[19 earlier articles]
Re: Ada GC kweise@pluto.colsa.com (1996-02-09)
Re: Ada GC dewar@cs.nyu.edu (1996-02-10)
Re: Ada GC boehm@parc.xerox.com (1996-02-13)
Re: Ada GC yanowitz@mcet.edu (1996-02-13)
Re: Ada GC kelvin@cs.iastate.edu (1996-02-13)
Re: Ada GC stt@copperfield.camb.inmet.com (1996-02-13)
Re: Ada GC rfg@monkeys.com (1996-02-13)
Re: Ada GC boehm@parc.xerox.com (1996-02-14)
Re: Ada GC jsa@organon.com (1996-02-14)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: rfg@monkeys.com (Ronald F. Guilmette)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers,comp.lang.ada
Date: 13 Feb 1996 18:04:32 -0500
Organization: Infinite Monkeys & Co.
References: 96-01-037 96-02-030 96-02-091
Keywords: Ada, GC

Henry Baker <hbaker@netcom.com> wrote:
>It's no harder to formally specify what it means to 'have GC' than it
>is to specify what it means to be 'real-time'. ...


Kevin Weise <kweise@pluto.colsa.com> wrote:
>I admit I haven't read the specifications and definitions of all new
>languages for the past twenty years. But I have *never* seen a language
>specification that did this, except for certain assemblers that told you
>how many machine cycles each instruction required to execute...


Check the C++ language standard... library section.


(Certainly of the STL library operations have time complexity requirements
in the draft standard.)
--


-- Ron Guilmette, Roseville, CA -------- Infinite Monkeys & Co. ------------
---- E-mail: rfg@monkeys.com ----------- Purveyors of Compiler Test Suites -
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.