Related articles |
---|
Re: Possible to write compiler to Java VM? salomon@silver.cs.umanitoba.ca (1996-01-30) |
Re: Ada design stt@copperfield.camb.inmet.com (1996-01-31) |
Re: Ada design ncohen@watson.ibm.com (1996-01-31) |
Re: Ada design rfg@monkeys.com (1996-02-01) |
Re: Ada design salomon@silver.cs.umanitoba.ca (1996-02-02) |
Re: Ada design adam@irvine.com (1996-02-02) |
Re: Ada design blaak@mda.ca (1996-02-04) |
From: | blaak@mda.ca (Ray Blaak) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers,comp.lang.ada |
Date: | 4 Feb 1996 00:58:18 -0500 |
Organization: | Macdonald Dettwiler & Associates |
References: | 96-01-130 96-01-145 96-02-016 |
Keywords: | Ada, syntax |
salomon@silver.cs.umanitoba.ca (Daniel J. Salomon) writes:
>Ada is really the language of the nineties: forbid
>smoking, forbid cholesterol, forbid sex. Maybe its better for me, but
>it sure takes the fun out of life.
I have always found this idea a little strange. There seems to be a
political image associated with one's choice of language: Ada is for
conservative types who like state control; C is for liberated free
thinkers with cool clothes who can dance at the edge of anarchy.
(Un)fortunately, digital computers don't give a damn about politics. A
single bit error can bring a whole system crashing down. For safe
systems, adherence to interfaces is crucial for reliable
behaviour. Using a strongly typed language enforces the *programmer's*
abstractions, independent of their political bent. At any rate, one is
free to use dangerous programming practices in Ada; it is simply more
more obvious that they are occurring.
Cheers,
Ray Blaak
blaak@mda.ca
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.