Related articles |
---|
Possible to write compiler to Java VM? (I volunteer to summarize) seibel@sirius.com (Peter Seibel) (1996-01-17) |
Re: Ada GC (was about Java VM) jacobi@parc.xerox.com (1996-01-31) |
Re: Ada GC (was about Java VM) dewar@cs.nyu.edu (1996-02-01) |
Re: Ada GC and real-time redhawk@flash.net (Ken & Virginia Garlington) (1996-02-03) |
Re: Ada GC and real-time dewar@cs.nyu.edu (1996-02-04) |
From: | Ken & Virginia Garlington <redhawk@flash.net> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers,comp.lang.ada |
Date: | 3 Feb 1996 12:25:35 -0500 |
Organization: | Redhawk Kennels |
References: | 96-01-037 96-01-147 96-02-004 |
Keywords: | realtime, Ada |
Robert Dewar wrote:
>
> The issue in hard real-time is of course not efficiency but
> predictability and removal of non-determinism. That's a little bit
> different. I agree that for general programming, GC is highly
> desirable (it is for me a fundamental dividing line between low and
> high level languages).
And, of course, the other issue in _safety-critical_ hard real-time
systems is being able to verify the safety and reliability of the
algorithm. We have enough trouble verifying Ada 83 code after
removing tasking and exception handling (at least, the parts we can
remove).
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.