Related articles |
---|
Possible to write compiler to Java VM? (I volunteer to summarize) seibel@sirius.com (Peter Seibel) (1996-01-17) |
Re: Possible to write compiler to Java VM? hbaker@netcom.com (1996-01-29) |
Re: Possible to write compiler to Java VM? ncohen@watson.ibm.com (1996-01-29) |
Re: Possible to write compiler to Java VM? salomon@silver.cs.umanitoba.ca (1996-01-30) |
Re: Ada design stt@copperfield.camb.inmet.com (1996-01-31) |
Re: Ada design ncohen@watson.ibm.com (1996-01-31) |
Re: Ada design rfg@monkeys.com (1996-02-01) |
Re: Ada design salomon@silver.cs.umanitoba.ca (1996-02-02) |
Re: Ada design adam@irvine.com (1996-02-02) |
Re: Ada design blaak@mda.ca (1996-02-04) |
From: | rfg@monkeys.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) |
Newsgroups: | comp.lang.java,comp.compilers,comp.lang.ada |
Date: | 1 Feb 1996 21:47:50 -0500 |
Organization: | Infinite Monkeys & Co. |
References: | 96-01-037 96-01-100 96-01-116 96-01-130 |
Keywords: | design, Ada |
Daniel J. Salomon <salomon@silver.cs.umanitoba.ca> wrote:
>
>Ada's philosophy seems to be, "When in doubt, forbid it." As a
>result, a programmer can spend a lot of time turning sensible safe
>code into code that religiously observes all of Ada rules.
>
>C's philosopy seems to be, "When in doubt, permit it. It just might
>be correct." The freedom that this gives programmers to create new
>ways of solving problems may be one of the reasons that C remains so
>popular, despite the fact that it it unquestionably unsafe.
The more you work on OPC (other people's code), the more you come to
appreciate the former philosophy.
--
-- Ron Guilmette, Roseville, CA --
---- E-mail: rfg@monkeys.com -----
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.