Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| Inlining functions with loops mpr@absoft.com (Michael Rice) (1995-11-29) |
| Re: Inlining functions with loops jplevyak@violet-femmes.cs.uiuc.edu (1995-11-30) |
| Re: Inlining functions with loops meissner@cygnus.com (Michael Meissner) (1995-11-30) |
| Re: Inlining functions with loops preston@tera.com (1995-11-30) |
| Re: Inlining functions with loops ayers@apollo.hp.com (1995-11-30) |
| Re: Inlining functions with loops cdg@nullstone.com (1995-12-01) |
| Re: Inlining functions with loops jeremy@suede.sw.oz.au (1995-12-01) |
| Inlining functions with loops dave@occl-cam.demon.co.uk (Dave Lloyd) (1995-12-01) |
| Re: Inlining functions with loops serrano@ardeche.IRO.UMontreal.CA (1995-12-01) |
| Re: Inlining functions with loops tore@lis.pitt.edu (1995-12-09) |
| [5 later articles] |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| From: | preston@tera.com (Preston Briggs) |
| Keywords: | optimize, C++, question |
| Organization: | /etc/organization |
| References: | 95-11-241 |
| Date: | Thu, 30 Nov 1995 23:55:17 GMT |
"Michael Rice" <mpr@absoft.com> writes:
>All C++ compilers that I am aware of will not inline a function if it
>contains any type of loop. Is anyone aware of ANY C++ compiler that
>will do this? Is anyone aware of a compiler for any language which is
>able to do this?
Sure, our compilers will. In fortran, C, or C++.
I'm certain there must be other, more readily available examples.
>I believe the basic problem is the inability to convert such a function
>to a suitable expression tree.
Assuming you have a tree-like IR (not required), you could put the
function body in front of the expression (just like any other loop),
and put the "returned" value in a temporary. Then reference the
temporary in the expression tree.
Preston Briggs
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.