Re: 'Superoptimizers'

jmccarty@spdmail.spd.dsccc.com (Mike McCarty)
Wed, 22 Nov 1995 00:45:58 GMT

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Re: 'Superoptimizers' glew@ichips.intel.com (1995-11-09)
Re: 'Superoptimizers' cdg@nullstone.com (1995-11-14)
Re: 'Superoptimizers' bill@amber.ssd.hcsc.com (1995-11-15)
Re: 'Superoptimizers' theoblit@wam.umd.edu (1995-11-17)
Re: 'Superoptimizers' nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (1995-11-20)
Re: 'Superoptimizers' hbaker@netcom.com (1995-11-21)
Re: 'Superoptimizers' jmccarty@spdmail.spd.dsccc.com (1995-11-22)
Re: 'Superoptimizers' jan@neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (1995-11-23)
Re: 'Superoptimizers' bill@amber.ssd.hcsc.com (1995-11-27)
Re: 'Superoptimizers' chase@centerline.com (1995-11-28)
| List of all articles for this month |
Newsgroups: comp.benchmarks,comp.compilers,comp.arch
From: jmccarty@spdmail.spd.dsccc.com (Mike McCarty)
Keywords: optimize
Organization: DSC Communications Corporation, Plano, Texas USA
References: <47b2fl$d4l@news.ox.ac.uk> 95-11-080
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 1995 00:45:58 GMT

Andy Glew <glew@ichips.intel.com> wrote:


)I would love to have compilers that:
)
)(a) Used profiling feedback to guide how much time to spend on
)optimizing a particular routine....
)(b) Used "compilation time" as a command line parameter. ...


How about a compiler which would run for some amount of time and then
produce object, plus restart information (intermediate files of some
sort) to continue optimization at a later date?


Mike
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.