Re: Looking for easily portable version of C

okelly@uk.oracle.com wrote:


>I've got Small-C at the moment, but it's a rather old version and it
>hasn't got structs and things in it, but it is very easy to port,
>compared to somthing like LCC.


>Any recomendations?


>Thanks
>[I'd be surprised if you found a real C compiler easier to port than lcc. -John]


When I looked at LCC, I could not find anything helpfull on porting
it. I had the usual x86, VAX (and SPARC? can't remember) ports, and
info on how to compile these, but no info on porting from scratch
appart from "you need to port [this bit] of the compiler", gee thanks.




Small-C maybe small, but at least you can port it in a couple of hours
by changing one file that is well commented.


:-(
--

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.