Re: ADA/C++ Compatibility problems

jan@neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (Jan Vorbrueggen)
Thu, 7 Sep 1995 13:28:44 GMT

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
ADA/C++ Compatibility problems dasilvia@sonalysts.com (1995-08-18)
Re: ADA/C++ Compatibility problems papayd@gtewd.mtv.gtegsc.com (Dave Papay M/S 7G32 x2791) (1995-08-21)
Re: ADA/C++ Compatibility problems bobduff@world.std.com (1995-08-21)
Re: ADA/C++ Compatibility problems stachour@klondike.winternet.com (1995-08-25)
Re: ADA/C++ Compatibility problems jan@neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (1995-08-30)
Re: ADA/C++ Compatibility problems gbaker@rp.CSIRO.AU (1995-09-07)
Re: ADA/C++ Compatibility problems jan@neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (1995-09-07)
Re: ADA/C++ Compatibility problems leichter@zodiac.rutgers.edu (1995-09-07)
Re: ADA/C++ Compatibility problems przemek@rrdjazz.nist.gov (1995-09-13)
Re: ADA/C++ Compatibility problems jbuck@Synopsys.COM (1995-09-17)
Re: ADA/C++ Compatibility problems leichter@zodiac.rutgers.edu (1995-09-21)
| List of all articles for this month |
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
From: jan@neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (Jan Vorbrueggen)
In-Reply-To: jan@neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de's message of Wed, 30 Aug 1995 11:22:44 GMT
Keywords: architecture, comment
Organization: Institut fuer Neuroinformatik, Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum, Germany
References: 95-08-127 95-08-189 95-09-031
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 1995 13:28:44 GMT

Our moderator comments on VMS' calling conventions:


      [I gather there are (were?) performance problems -- the heavyweight CALLS
      and CALLG instructions used in the common calling sequence were complicated
      and slow. -John]


But those are artefacts of the VAX implementation. What I wanted to point out
is that VMS bothered to define a calling convention (including argument
passing mechanisms) and held both its own public interfaces and all compilers
to it. Most of the language manuals I've read also gave hints and examples to
explain and overcome the idiosyncrasies of languages in inter-language
calls. I'm sure that VMS on AXP does the same, without the CALL(S|G) slowdown.


Jan
[Good point. For that matter, OS/360 had a common calling sequence that was
reasonably fast and made it possible to intercall among Fortran, Cobol, and
PL/I. -John]
--


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.