Related articles |
---|
LL(1) Grammar for Expressions with Assignment bergmann@elvis.rowan.edu (1995-06-27) |
Re: LL(1) Grammar for Expressions with Assignment jos@and.nl (1995-06-30) |
Re: LL(1) Grammar for Expressions with Assignment parrt@lonewolf.parr-research.com (1995-07-01) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | parrt@lonewolf.parr-research.com (Terence John Parr) |
Keywords: | LL(1), parse |
Organization: | Parr Research Corporation |
References: | 95-06-075 |
Date: | Sat, 1 Jul 1995 16:55:53 GMT |
Seth Bergmann (bergmann@elvis.rowan.edu) wrote:
: I've been trying to find an LL(1) grammar for the language of
: expressions such as:
...
: but excluded would be things like:
: 3+a=4 and 2 = a
: analysis. I suspect this language of expressions is not LL(1).
I believe that it is non-LL(k) for any finite k; for example,
I can write this
(((((((((((3+a))))))))))) = 4
You would never be able to see past the '('s with finite lookahead.
I believe a semantic analysis of the resulting AST would be the best
route.
I suspect that any grammar that could describe this lvalue problem
(purely) syntactically would be very very large.
Regards,
Terence
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.