Re: Editing/storing syntax trees

hagerman@ece.cmu.edu (John Hagerman)
Sat, 24 Jun 1995 12:07:16 GMT

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Re: Q: Definition of a scripting lang. lwall@netlabs.com (1995-03-27)
Editing/storing syntax trees preston@tera.com (1995-05-28)
Re: Editing/storing syntax trees stefan.monnier@epfl.ch (Stefan Monnier) (1995-06-05)
Re: Editing/storing syntax trees hbaker@netcom.com (1995-06-23)
Re: Editing/storing syntax trees daniels@cse.ogi.edu (1995-06-23)
Re: Editing/storing syntax trees bevan@cs.man.ac.uk (1995-06-23)
Re: Editing/storing syntax trees frode@news2.deltanet.com (Frode Odegard) (1995-06-24)
Re: Editing/storing syntax trees hagerman@ece.cmu.edu (1995-06-24)
Re: Editing/storing syntax trees preston@tera.com (1995-06-24)
Re: Editing/storing syntax trees jhallen@world.std.com (1995-06-27)
Re: Editing/storing syntax trees boggs@osage.csc.ti.com (1995-06-27)
Re: Editing/storing syntax trees stefan.monnier@epfl.ch (Stefan Monnier) (1995-06-27)
Re: Editing/storing syntax trees stefan.monnier@epfl.ch (Stefan Monnier) (1995-06-27)
| List of all articles for this month |
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
From: hagerman@ece.cmu.edu (John Hagerman)
Keywords: syntax, tools
Organization: Carnegie Mellon University
References: 95-04-013 95-06-022
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 1995 12:07:16 GMT
Status: RO

Stefan Monnier <stefan.monnier@epfl.ch> writes:
> In systems such as unix, most tools are designed to work with text,
> so it's a pain to deal with anything else than text. But if every
> tool would be designed to deal with objects, ...


Then you would have Objix? (And objixions, etc.)


Seriously, every time I work with "objects" I begin by (or end up
having to) write code to read/write a text format for debugging (at
least). How many times have the advantages of plain text been re-
discovered? One recent example: mark-up language standards.


~ John
--


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.