Re: The semicolon habit (was: Q: Definition of a scripting lang.)

ok@cs.rmit.edu.au (Richard A. O'Keefe)
Thu, 4 May 1995 10:40:22 GMT

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[9 earlier articles]
Re: The semicolon habit (was: Q: Definition of a scripting lang.) J.C.Highfield@loughborough.ac.uk (1995-04-30)
Re: The semicolon habit (was: Q: Definition of a scripting lang.) mitchell@mdd.comm.mot.com (1995-04-30)
Re: The semicolon habit (was: Q: Definition of a scripting lang.) daveb@perth.DIALix.oz.au (1995-04-30)
Re: The semicolon habit (was: Q: Definition of a scripting lang.) anw@maths.nottingham.ac.uk (Dr A. N. Walker) (1995-05-02)
Re: The semicolon habit (was: Q: Definition of a scripting lang.) lwall@netlabs.com (1995-05-09)
Re: The semicolon habit (was: Q: Definition of a scripting lang.) tchannon@black.demon.co.uk (Tim Channon) (1995-05-04)
Re: The semicolon habit (was: Q: Definition of a scripting lang.) ok@cs.rmit.edu.au (1995-05-04)
Re: The semicolon habit (was: Q: Definition of a scripting lang.) bevan@cs.man.ac.uk (1995-05-10)
Re: The semicolon habit (was: Q: Definition of a scripting lang.) bevan@cs.man.ac.uk (1995-05-10)
Re: The semicolon habit (was: Q: Definition of a scripting lang.) monnier@di.epfl.ch (Stefan Monnier) (1995-05-11)
Re: The semicolon habit (was: Q: Definition of a scripting lang.) cef@geodesic.com (Charles Fiterman) (1995-05-11)
Re: The semicolon habit (was: Q: Definition of a scripting lang.) plong@perf.com (1995-05-11)
Re: The semicolon habit (was: Q: Definition of a scripting lang.) stidev@gate.net (1995-05-12)
[5 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
From: ok@cs.rmit.edu.au (Richard A. O'Keefe)
Keywords: design
Organization: Comp Sci, RMIT, Melbourne, Australia
References: 95-04-013 95-04-186
Date: Thu, 4 May 1995 10:40:22 GMT

scooter@mccabe.mccabe.com (Scott Stanchfield) writes:
>On the mainframe, tabs were a non-issue. On UNIX, I think they could cause
>tons of grief.


Only if people muddle up and confuse three quite distinct things:


        - to what columns should the TAB format effector move?
UNIX convention here is absolutely consistent: multiples of 8.
Anything else violates UNIX conventions, the expectations of a
lot of tools and a great many people, and good manners.


        - how big should the indent increment be in language XYZ?
This has nothing to do with interpretation of the TAB character.
For example, my editor has TAB=8 built in, but there is a command
to set indentation to whatever you want (typically 3 or 4).


        - what key sequence should I press in my editor to move to the
next indentation level?
This could be the TAB key on the keyboard without having any
connection whatsoever with TAB characters in the file. (This
is so in Emacs, for example, where the TAB *key* is an indentation
command having only the loosest of connections with the TAB
*CHARACTER*.


The right answer is to use whatever _command_ you want for indentation
and whatever _indentation level_ you want, but leave the interpretation
of _tab characters_ strictly alone.


--
Richard A. O'Keefe; http://www.cs.rmit.edu.au/~ok; RMIT Comp.Sci.
--


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.