Related articles |
---|
Adding BASIC script interpreter malak@access.digex.net (1995-02-16) |
Adding BASIC script interpreter Dave@OCCL-CAM.DEMON.CO.UK (Dave Lloyd) (1995-02-17) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | Dave Lloyd <Dave@OCCL-CAM.DEMON.CO.UK> |
Keywords: | Basic, interpreter |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
Referecnes: | 95-02-125 |
Date: | Fri, 17 Feb 1995 02:55:01 GMT |
Michael Malak said...
> I am searching for an easy way to add a macro/scripting capability to
> my application developed under the Watcom C/C++ 10.0 DOS extender. My
> first choice would be a BASIC-type language, as most of the end-users
> for the application already know BASIC.
Under OS/2 I would strongly recommend REXX as the language of choice. It
has much of the basic simplicity but is a bit cleaner and has a pretty
intelligible syntax. More importantly it is designed as a scripting
language both for driving an application (such as a command shell or
editor) and for providing user-scripting (such as a comms package). Look
for the REXX FAQ (dunno where) which has a list of REXX interpreters
available for other platforms including DOS (though not so sure about an
extender).
Regards,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dave Lloyd Email: Dave@occl-cam.demon.co.uk
Oxford and Cambridge Compilers Ltd Phone: (44) 223 572074
55 Brampton Rd, Cambridge CB1 3HJ, UK
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.