Re: programmer optimizations?

gnb@bby.com.au (Gregory Bond)
Thu, 2 Feb 1995 22:51:21 GMT

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[12 earlier articles]
Re: programmer optimizations? cdg@nullstone.com (1995-01-23)
Re: programmer optimizations? hbaker@netcom.com (1995-01-27)
Re: programmer optimizations? cdg@nullstone.com (1995-01-31)
Re: programmer optimizations? c1veeru@WATSON.IBM.COM (Virendra K. Mehta) (1995-02-02)
Re: programmer optimizations? hbaker@netcom.com (1995-02-01)
Re: programmer optimizations? bill@amber.ssd.csd.harris.com (1995-02-01)
Re: programmer optimizations? gnb@bby.com.au (1995-02-02)
Re: programmer optimizations? rfg@rahul.net (Ronald F. Guilmette) (1995-02-04)
| List of all articles for this month |
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
From: gnb@bby.com.au (Gregory Bond)
Keywords: optimize
Organization: Burdett, Buckeridge & Young Ltd., Melbourne, Australia
References: 95-01-047 95-02-003
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 1995 22:51:21 GMT

"Virendra K. Mehta" <c1veeru@WATSON.IBM.COM> writes:


      The problem here is that the programmer KNOWS that the variable
      need not be placed on the alias list. I think there should be some
      way for him to be able to communicate this to the compiler.


What's wrong with putting the value into an auto variable?
--
Gregory Bond <gnb@bby.com.au> Burdett Buckeridge & Young Ltd Melbourne Australia
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.