Re: f77 on Sun vs. on HPRISC's

harrist@hsd.utc.com (harris)
Wed, 7 Dec 1994 14:07:13 GMT

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
f77 on SUN vs. on HPRISC'S khire@cae.wisc.edu (1994-12-03)
Re: f77 on SUN vs. on HPRISC'S przemek@rrdjazz.nist.gov (1994-12-05)
Re: f77 on Sun vs. on HPRISC's harrist@hsd.utc.com (1994-12-07)
Re: f77 on SUN vs. on HPRISC'S adams@fb0431.mathematik.th-darmstadt.de (1994-12-14)
Re: f77 on Sun vs. on HPRISC's jan@neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (1994-12-16)
Re: f77 on Sun vs. on HPRISC's shankar@sgi.com (1994-12-21)
| List of all articles for this month |
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
From: harrist@hsd.utc.com (harris)
Keywords: Fortran, comment
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 94-12-034
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 1994 14:07:13 GMT

On Sat, 3 Dec 1994 Milind Khire <khire@cae.wisc.edu> wrote:


> If anyone knows what are the exact differences in FORTRAN (f77)
> compilers or systems for SUN and HPRISC...


I don't know all the differences, but I did have a very similar problem
myself. In my case the problem was the HP compiler does not remember the
values of local subroutine variables from one pass to the next. One
possible fix is to pass these local variables through a common block.


I'd be interested if anyone knows of any other differences like this.


Tom Harris
harrist@hsd.utc.com
[The f77 SAVE statement should do the trick. -John]
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.