Re: Polymorphism vs. Overloading

ryer@dsd.camb.inmet.com (Mike Ryer)
Fri, 28 Oct 1994 16:54:42 GMT

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[3 earlier articles]
Polymorphism vs. Overloading gdevivo@conicit.ve (1994-10-22)
Re: Polymorphism vs. Overloading jhallen@world.std.com (1994-10-22)
Polymorphism vs. Overloading nandu@cs.clemson.edu (1994-10-27)
Re: Polymorphism vs. Overloading norman@flaubert.bellcore.com (1994-10-24)
Re: Polymorphism vs. Overloading ichudov@wiltel.com (1994-10-28)
Re: Polymorphism vs. Overloading strohm@mksol.dseg.ti.com (1994-10-28)
Re: Polymorphism vs. Overloading ryer@dsd.camb.inmet.com (1994-10-28)
Re: Polymorphism vs. Overloading mac@coos.dartmouth.edu (1994-10-25)
Re: Polymorphism vs. Overloading joe@sanskrit.ho.att.com (1994-10-31)
Re: Polymorphism vs. Overloading geld@cs.sun.ac.za (1994-10-31)
Re: Polymorphism vs. Overloading ram@cs.cmu.edu (Rob MacLachlan) (1994-10-25)
Re: Polymorphism vs. Overloading billk@cs.ukans.edu (1994-10-31)
Re: Polymorphism vs. Overloading Mike.Chapman@muc.de (Mike Chapman) (1994-10-31)
[21 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |

Newsgroups: comp.compilers
From: ryer@dsd.camb.inmet.com (Mike Ryer)
Keywords: polymorphism
Organization: Intermetrics, Inc.
References: 94-10-144
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 1994 16:54:42 GMT

Overloading happens at compilation time -- the compiler decides which function
to invoke based on statically-determined types of the operands.


Polymorphism may not happen until runtime -- the compiler generates code that
fans out based on the runtime value of a tag.
--


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.