Related articles |
---|
Alternatives to Lex/YACC? mit0sab@dmu.ac.uk (1994-08-16) |
Looking for a book with emphasis on interpreters adracup@vnet.ibm.com (1994-08-18) |
Re: Looking for a book with emphasis on interpreters kendall@pot.East.Sun.COM (1994-08-19) |
Re: Looking for a book with emphasis on interpreters ast@halcyon.halcyon.com (1994-08-19) |
Re: Looking for a book with emphasis on interpreters norman@flaubert.bellcore.com (1994-08-19) |
Re: Looking for a book with emphasis on interpreters eac@iexist.att.com (1994-08-20) |
Re: Looking for a book with emphasis on interpreters anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (1994-08-22) |
Re: Looking for a book with emphasis on interpreters johnl@cs.indiana.edu (John Lacey) (1994-08-22) |
[2 later articles] |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers.tools.pccts,comp.compilers |
From: | adracup@vnet.ibm.com (Andy Dracup) |
Keywords: | books, interpreter, question, comment |
Organization: | IBM Glendale Laboratory, Endicott, NY |
References: | 94-08-100 |
Date: | Thu, 18 Aug 1994 12:45:57 GMT |
compilers-faq lists a bunch of books, one with 'interpreters' in its title
(Mak's: Writing Compilers and Interpreters). I'm mainly interested in
intrepreters, and in particular, REXX. Since Mak's book is flamed in the
FAQ can someone recommend a better book on the theory and practice of
writing interpreters?
Andy Dracup
[There are a few from the 1970s but I haven't seen any recent ones. -John]
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.