Related articles |
---|
Does the gcc optimizer rearrange floating point expressions? jrs+@cs.cmu.edu (1994-06-26) |
Re: Does the gcc optimizer rearrange floating point expressions? dmoore@reed.edu (1994-06-28) |
Re: Does the gcc optimizer rearrange floating point expressions? drtr@mailer.astronomy.cambridge.ac.uk (1994-06-29) |
Re: Does the gcc optimizer rearrange floating point expressions? dje@cygnus.com (1994-06-30) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | dmoore@reed.edu (Dave Moore) |
Keywords: | GCC, C, optimize |
Organization: | Reed College, Portland, Oregon |
References: | 94-06-188 |
Date: | Tue, 28 Jun 1994 02:35:30 GMT |
Jonathan R Shewchuk <jrs+@cs.cmu.edu> wrote:
>Although I havent started coding yet, I'm worried that optimizing C
>compilers, particularly gcc (which is my main compiler), may foolishly
>rearrange expressions under the mistaken belief that floating point
>numbers are subject to the usual rules of arithmetic. For instance, given
>the expression (x + y) - y, which I use to determine the amount of
>floating point roundoff error in (x + y), a non-floating point-aware
>optimizer might mistakenly reduce it to x.
From an examination of the assembler output of gcc with and without
the -O flag, it appears that gcc does indeed optimize away the
expression. However, setting the variables to be "volatile" seems to
correct the problem. Incidentally, aren't the values in <float.h> what
you are looking for? i.e., DBL_EPSILON, the smallest number such that
1.0 + x != 1.0? I may just misunderstand your question tho.
...Dave
--
Dave Moore - Student at Large - Reed College
dmoore@reed.edu - http://www.reed.edu/~dmoore/
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.