Related articles |
---|
Target machine for compiler course Mike.Spivey@comlab.oxford.ac.uk (1994-06-01) |
Re: Target machine for compiler course brandis@inf.ethz.ch (Marc Brandis) (1994-06-03) |
Re: Target machine for compiler course a_tucker@paul.spu.edu (Andrew Tucker) (1994-06-03) |
Re: Target machine for compiler course salomon@silver.cs.umanitoba.ca (1994-06-03) |
Re: Target machine for compiler course haahr@netcom.com (1994-06-03) |
Re: Target machine for compiler course mackey@cse.ucsc.edu (1994-06-11) |
Re: Target machine for compiler course andrewd@seldon.apanix.apana.org.au (1994-06-05) |
Re: Target machine for compiler course anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (1994-06-13) |
Re: Target machine for compiler course mds@doc.ic.ac.uk (Mark 'Maxx' Simmons) (1994-06-11) |
[1 later articles] |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | Andrew Tucker <a_tucker@paul.spu.edu> |
Keywords: | courses |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
Date: | Fri, 3 Jun 1994 02:46:04 GMT |
On Wed, 1 Jun 1994, Mike Spivey wrote:
> I found the discussion about what to teach in a six-hour course on
> compilers very helpful; so I'd like to hear what people think about
> the choice of a target machine for a first course in compilers.
>
> Some people would advocate (a subset of) C or Pascal as the target
> 'machine' code -- but I feel that doesn't really make the story a
> credible one, even if it is a good way to prototype new languages.
> [Holub in his book used a machine-level subset of C, whish seemed to me
> to work pretty well.-John]
As a future compiler writer who just finished his first compilers course
this past winter quarter, I was extremely pleased with Holub's book. His
use of "machine-level subsest of C" looked was sufficient to create a
virtual machine environment, while allowing it to be portable to any C
compiler.
----
/* Andrew */
a_tucker@paul.spu.edu
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.