Related articles |
---|
P-Code and virtual machines ghmilmei@iiic.ethz.ch (1994-03-23) |
Re: P-Code and virtual machines pardo@cs.washington.edu (1994-03-25) |
Threaded code (was Re: P-Code and virtual machines) mark@godzilla.Quotron.COM) (1994-03-26) |
Threaded code (was Re: P-Code and virtual machines) bevan@cs.man.ac.uk (Stephen J Bevan) (1994-03-27) |
Re: P-Code and virtual machines koopman@casun2.res.utc.com (1994-03-28) |
Re: Threaded code (was Re: P-Code and virtual machines) pardo@cs.washington.edu (1994-03-29) |
Re: Threaded code (was Re: P-Code and virtual machines) uho@informatik.uni-kiel.d400.de (Ulrich Hoffmann) (1994-03-30) |
[2 later articles] |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | ghmilmei@iiic.ethz.ch (Gerard Henri Rene Milmeister) |
Keywords: | interpreter, question |
Organization: | Dept. Informatik, Swiss Federal Inst of Tech (ETH), Zurich, CH |
Date: | Wed, 23 Mar 1994 07:41:46 GMT |
I am interested in what the instruction set of an interpreter (over
a virtual machine) for procedural languages would look like. I have
made some experience with stack machines: they seem not appropriate
for languages like C.
Are there any books or, better, online papers about this.
Gerard
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.