Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| [10 earlier articles] |
| Re: What's the word for... tchannon@black.demon.co.uk (1994-02-20) |
| Re: What's the word for... moreaux@litsun31.epfl.ch (1994-02-20) |
| Re: What's the word for... sasghm@unx.sas.com (1994-02-21) |
| Re: What's the word for... weberwu@tfh-berlin.de (1994-02-21) |
| Re: What's the word for... jan@neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (1994-02-22) |
| Re: What's the word for... andrewd@apanix.apana.org.au (1994-02-22) |
| Re: What's the word for... muysers@capsogeti.fr (1994-02-23) |
| Re: What's the word for... sasghm@unx.sas.com (1994-02-23) |
| Re: What's the word for... lloyd@bruce.cs.monash.edu.au (1994-02-24) |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| From: | muysers@capsogeti.fr (Dirk Muysers) |
| Keywords: | theory |
| Organization: | Cap Gemini Innovation, Centre de Recherche de Paris |
| References: | 94-02-106 |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Feb 1994 06:18:27 GMT |
The word I remember from my postgraduate training in computer
science, back in the sixties, is: "protosyntactic"
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.