Related articles |
---|
setjmp/longjmp implementations hbaker@netcom.com (1994-02-16) |
Summary of setjmp/longjmp responses hbaker@netcom.com (1994-02-17) |
Re: Summary of setjmp/longjmp responses mueller@nu.cs.fsu.edu (1994-02-18) |
Re: Summary of setjmp/longjmp responses pardo@cs.washington.edu (1994-02-18) |
Summary of setjmp/longjmp responses meissner@osf.org (1994-02-22) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | meissner@osf.org |
Keywords: | C |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 94-02-117 94-02-097 |
Date: | Tue, 22 Feb 1994 20:00:11 GMT |
> Thanks to those who responded re my setjmp/longjmp questions. ...
> 1. No commonly used benchmarks depend upon setjmp/longjmp performance.
> [If this is so, I'm amazed that setjmp/longjmp work at all! :-). ]
Given that the main loop of every shell I've ever seen includes a
setjmp call, and error situations are handled by longjmp'ing to the
setjmp'ed address, I would say it would become pretty obvious that
setjmp/long jmp wasn't working. It just doesn't have to work FAST.
Note on some systems, longjmp has to do a system call (typically
_sigreturn) in order to allow longjmp's from signal handlers to work
(the _sigreturn would clear out signal state).
--
Michael Meissner email: meissner@osf.org phone: 617-621-8861
Open Software Foundation, 11 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA, 02142
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.