Related articles |
---|
[3 earlier articles] |
Re: What's the word for... tjj@netnews.summit.novell.com (1994-02-17) |
Re: What's the word for... lawley@kurango.cit.gu.edu.au (1994-02-18) |
Re: What's the word for... PJENSEN@CSI.compuserve.com (1994-02-18) |
Re: What's the word for... marcoj@iro.umontreal.ca (Marco Jacques) (1994-02-18) |
Re: What's the word for... galibero@mines.u-nancy.fr (1994-02-18) |
Re: What's the word for... glockner@cosc.bsu.umd.edu (Alexander Glockner) (1994-02-18) |
Re: What's the word for... norman@flaubert.bellcore.com (1994-02-19) |
Re: What's the word for... tchannon@black.demon.co.uk (1994-02-20) |
Re: What's the word for... moreaux@litsun31.epfl.ch (1994-02-20) |
Re: What's the word for... sasghm@unx.sas.com (1994-02-21) |
Re: What's the word for... weberwu@tfh-berlin.de (1994-02-21) |
Re: What's the word for... jan@neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (1994-02-22) |
Re: What's the word for... andrewd@apanix.apana.org.au (1994-02-22) |
[3 later articles] |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | norman@flaubert.bellcore.com (Norman Ramsey) |
Keywords: | theory |
Organization: | Bellcore, Morristown NJ |
References: | 94-02-106 |
Date: | Sat, 19 Feb 1994 16:33:06 GMT |
CNS-ksf-+Jordan T.J. <tjj@netnews.summit.novell.com> wrote:
>Could someone please tell me what the word is for a language
>which can be written in itself?
Some time back I saw something Luca Cardelli had written containing a
hierarchy of such questions. (It *may* have been his report on
`typeful programming'; I don't have a copy to check.) I don't
remember the exact hierarchy, but it was something like this.
Can the language write its own:
1 interpreter?
2 translator?
3 garbage collector?
4 run-time system?
5 operating system?
I don't remember whether he had any terminology attached to these
criteria. Perhaps someone who remembers the report can identify it
for you.
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.