Related articles |
---|
Rewriting as a means for translating hbaker@netcom.com (1994-02-04) |
Re: Rewriting as a means for translating schrod@iti.informatik.th-darmstadt.de (1994-02-07) |
Re: Rewriting as a means for translating parrt@s1.arc.umn.edu (Terence Parr) (1994-02-08) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | schrod@iti.informatik.th-darmstadt.de (Joachim Schrod) |
Keywords: | translator, tools |
Organization: | TH Darmstadt, FG Systemprogrammierung |
References: | 94-02-032 |
Date: | Mon, 7 Feb 1994 14:15:57 GMT |
hbaker@netcom.com (Henry G. Baker) writes:
> In my experience, the idea of source-to-source translation by means of
> a simple rewriting system is always a loser. No matter how close the
> languages seem, there are always significant "gotchas".
I agree with you, but how do you find the idea of Terence Parr to use
a high-level specification of tree transformations?
It's described in his paper ``An Overview of SORCERER: A Simple
Tree-Parser Generator.''
Available by anonymous ftp from the PCCTS archive
marvin.ecn.purdue.edu:/pub/pccts. European folks might want to use the
mirror at
ftp.th-darmstadt.de:/pub/programming/languages/compiler-compiler/pccts.
At least, I'm still waiting for the release of the SORCERER source...
Joachim
--
Joachim Schrod Email: schrod@iti.informatik.th-darmstadt.de
Computer Science Department
Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.