Re: Ox generalizes Yacc and Lex for attribute grammars

Andrew Tucker <a_tucker@paul.spu.edu>
Tue, 16 Nov 1993 14:48:05 GMT

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Ox generalizes Yacc and Lex for attribute grammars thomas.evans.shields@gmail.com (Tom Shields) (2019-02-06)
Ox generalizes Yacc and Lex for attribute grammars bischoff@cs.iastate.edu (Kurt Bischoff) (1993-11-16)
Re: Ox generalizes Yacc and Lex for attribute grammars a_tucker@paul.spu.edu (Andrew Tucker) (1993-11-16)
Re: Ox generalizes Yacc and Lex for attribute grammars wjw@eb.ele.tue.nl (1993-11-17)
Re: Ox generalizes Yacc and Lex for attribute grammars etxmow@garbo.ericsson.se (1993-11-17)
Re: Ox generalizes Yacc and Lex for attribute grammars bevan@cs.man.ac.uk (Stephen J Bevan) (1993-11-17)
Re: Ox generalizes Yacc and Lex for attribute grammars rad@cs.ucsb.edu (1993-11-18)
Re: Ox generalizes Yacc and Lex for attribute grammars cspt@giraffe.ru.ac.za (1993-11-19)
Re: Ox generalizes Yacc and Lex for attribute grammars buehlman@iwf.mabp.ethz.ch (1993-11-23)
| List of all articles for this month |
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
From: Andrew Tucker <a_tucker@paul.spu.edu>
Keywords: attribute, question, comment
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 93-11-100
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1993 14:48:05 GMT

On Tue, 16 Nov 1993, Kurt Bischoff wrote:
> Ox generalizes the function of Yacc in the way that attribute grammars
> generalize context-free grammars. Ordinary Yacc and Lex specifications


What are some good references for attribute grammars? Does the dragon
book talk about them at all?


---
/* Andrew */ email: a_tucker@paul.spu.edu
[In answer to the second question, they mention them twice but don't really
say anything about them. -John]
--

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.