Related articles |
---|
Semantic error recovery whatis@gni.ai.mit.edu (1993-11-02) |
Re: Semantic error recovery isckbk@leonis.nus.sg (1993-11-10) |
Re: Semantic error recovery mauney@adm.csc.ncsu.edu (1993-11-10) |
Re: Semantic error recovery wjw@eb.ele.tue.nl (1993-11-11) |
Re: Semantic error recovery sasghm@unx.sas.com (1993-11-11) |
Re: Semantic error recovery strohm@mksol.dseg.ti.com (1993-11-12) |
Re: Semantic error recovery olsen@verdix.com (1993-11-12) |
Re: Semantic error recovery enedervo@adobe.com (1993-11-12) |
Re: Semantic error recovery kanze@us-es.sel.de (James Kanze) (1993-11-15) |
Re: Semantic error recovery kanze@us-es.sel.de (James Kanze) (1993-11-15) |
Re: Semantic error recovery delano@snake.CS.Berkeley.EDU (1993-11-17) |
Re: Semantic error recovery bill@amber.csd.harris.com (1993-11-17) |
Re: Semantic error recovery weberwu@inf.fu-berlin.de (1993-11-18) |
[5 later articles] |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
From: | olsen@verdix.com (David Olsen) |
Keywords: | errors |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 93-11-072 93-11-063 |
Date: | Fri, 12 Nov 1993 18:58:37 GMT |
sasghm@unx.sas.com (Gary Merrill) writes:
> I would suggest that the "appallingly bad error handling" of "most
> commercial compilers" is partly a matter of perspecitve and largely a
> response to market demand rather than a consequence of ignorance or
> lack of effort.
When TauMetric first wrote their compiler, they put a lot of effort into
having good error messages. But customers complained bitterly and
demanded that the error messages be just like other UNIX compilers. A
quote from someone at TauMetric (I assume Mike Ball): "These [error]
messages are crude, giving only file name and line number, but they seem
to be what a lot of the UNIX and MSDOS hackers want. They have written
emacs (or brief) macros to parse these messages and move the cursor around
in the editor."
- David Olsen
olsen@verdix.com
--
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.